Any person is usually a good idea of ??the legal: we know of the existence of courts, laws, contracts, fines. Also, if you ask the man in the street what is meant by the law often identified with the notions of law, order and give you notes compulsory and coercive. Thus, for example, we know that we can demand certain behaviour of a person by the existence of a legal rule that gives us such power, and that compliance with this rule may be imposed coercively.
It sounds simple, yet extremely complex to provide a definition in a nutshell and as a mathematical formula technically we describe what is and has been the law.
Problems of ambiguity: easily check that the law can employ the term to refer to very different ideas:
- The Spanish law does not support the death penalty: objective law as a system of rules governing a country and a specific historical moment, given by the competent authority and coated binding.
- I have recognised the right to strike: Right subjective, meaning the faculty, attribution or privilege that the law recognises each individual target. If the objective law sets the standard of conduct, the law recognised the right is subjective to each person’s own right target. Here we could include all the rights of every subject, from the person inherent in even the most accidental.
- The law is a very old theoretical discipline: science of law, understood as research, the study of legal reality, both the right objective and subjective rights.
- No right to treat me this way: the right expression is translating the ideal of justice seems that it pursues. This law would mean just.
In short the term law is likely to take on multiple meanings.
Problems of vagueness: The concepts have a plane and a plane extensional intentional. While the intention would come up of all the properties applicable to a concept, its extension the form the scope thereof. Well, if the concept of the law there would be intentional and extensional vagueness. On the one hand we see our inability to identify which notes characterise the law. Thus, for some essential property to be coercive, so that whenever we were in the legal field should take this feature. For others it is not sufficient that property, generally also be required, and also others require that these were standards promulgated by the competent authority, and so on. Therefore, and ultimately the concept is intentionally vague.